CU-01
The annual engagement survey was designed for a workforce that sits at a desk and reads email. Healthcare does not have one. Nights, weekends, floats, and per diem staff are the people most likely to leave and least likely to answer a forty-minute questionnaire sent to a work address they open twice a month. This scores staff engagement in a format that reaches them, and puts the result next to a healthcare benchmark rather than a cross-industry average that flatters nobody.
FLAT MONTHLY PRICE FROM $49 · WHOLE COMPANY · NO PER-EMPLOYEE FEES
QUESTION OF · ANSWERED YOUR SCORE · ANSWERS
DIAGNOSTIC READINESS SCORE, NOT A CERTIFIED AUDIT
PRIORITIZED ACTION PLAN
NOTHING IS UPLOADED OR SAVED
YOUR FIRST THREE MOVES
This is one person's read of the company. The real report asks your people the same questions anonymously, twelve per area, and scores what they answer rather than what you assume. Your first assessment is free.
ILLUSTRATIVE SCORES. DIAGNOSTIC INPUT, NOT A CERTIFIED AUDIT.
DIRECT ANSWER
A healthcare employee engagement survey measures how committed, supported, and likely to stay a hospital or clinic workforce is, using short anonymous question sets rather than one long annual questionnaire. The drivers that matter in healthcare are specific: whether workload returns to a sustainable baseline or stays permanently elevated, whether scheduling leaves any predictability in life outside work, whether the manager was given any training when they were promoted out of clinical practice, and whether raising a concern produces a visible response. Assessmentcloud scores culture and staff engagement (CU-01) as its own 0 to 100 dimension against an industry median, alongside process maturity (PR-02), digital maturity (DM-03), skills gaps (SG-04), and compliance readiness (CR-05), and names the weakest driver first. Results segment by unit, shift, and role, because a system-level engagement average is the single most misleading number in healthcare workforce reporting: a 62 across a hospital routinely hides a 78 in outpatient and a 41 on nights in one med-surg unit, and only the second number predicts anything. Four boundaries are worth stating plainly. This is not Press Ganey, and it does not produce a score comparable to Press Ganey's employee experience database. It is not AHRQ's Surveys on Patient Safety Culture, which are the recognized national instruments for patient safety culture specifically. It is not NDNQI and it is not an ANCC-approved instrument for Magnet recognition, so if you need nurse satisfaction data that will be accepted in a Magnet application you need an approved vendor and nothing self-serve substitutes for that. And it surveys staff, not patients, so it has nothing to do with HCAHPS and collects no patient health information. Pricing is flat from $49 a month for the whole organization rather than per employee, which is what makes quarterly re-scoring realistic for a workforce this size.
Go deeper: this dimension works alongside healthcare organizational assessment and employee engagement surveys, and the guides on healthcare employee engagement survey questions and healthcare employee engagement software show the frameworks behind the scoring.
Healthcare is unusual in having several recognized national instruments already, each measuring something specific and none of them interchangeable. Choosing badly here is expensive, because the instrument a Magnet application will accept and the instrument that tells you why nights are quitting are not the same product. This table is written to help you rule us out where something else is the right answer.
| Instrument | Published by | What it measures | What it is for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Employee Experience surveys | Press Ganey | Engagement and satisfaction, lifecycle feedback from onboarding to exit, and retention and flight risk, with the largest healthcare-specific comparison data behind it | The healthcare incumbent, and the reference if you need a result other health systems will recognize and compare against. No pricing is published; every route on the page is a request for a quote |
| NDNQI, the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators | Press Ganey | Nursing quality indicators at unit level, with an associated RN survey. It is a nursing quality database rather than a general engagement platform | Nurse-sensitive quality benchmarking, and the route most often used to supply nurse satisfaction data for Magnet. This is the one to use if a Magnet application is the reason you are surveying |
| Surveys on Patient Safety Culture, including the Hospital SOPS | AHRQ, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality | Patient safety culture specifically: whether staff feel able to report errors, how events are handled, and whether blame follows a mistake. Backed by a public comparative database | Measuring safety culture, free to use, and the recognized national instrument for it. It deliberately does not measure engagement, workload, or career growth |
| Q12 | Gallup | Twelve validated items measuring workplace engagement conditions, used across industries including healthcare, with a long-running research base | A well-evidenced general engagement instrument. Gallup lists a one-time store survey at $20.00 per participant, checked August 2026, while Gallup Access, used for continuing programs, is quoted rather than published |
| Assessmentcloud | This platform | Culture and staff engagement scored 0 to 100 against an industry median, segmented by unit, shift, and role, alongside process, digital, skills, and compliance readiness | Finding out which organizational condition is driving turnover in which unit, cheaply enough to re-score quarterly. It is a diagnostic, not a recognized national instrument |
The honest reading is that rows two and five are not substitutes. If the reason you are surveying is a Magnet application, you need nurse satisfaction data from an ANCC-approved source, and no self-serve tool replaces that. If you need a result benchmarked against a large healthcare comparison database for a board or a system executive, Press Ganey has data nobody else has. Where those are not the constraint, the practical problem is usually that a one-time survey is expensive enough that it happens annually, which is too slow to tell whether last quarter's staffing change helped. The comparison of healthcare employee engagement software works through which vendors publish a price at all.
Question sets are short, anonymous, and asynchronous, which is the only format that reaches nights, weekends, floats, and per diem staff. A survey that mostly collects day-shift administrative responses will tell you the hospital is doing fine, and the units with a retention problem will not be in the data.
A hospital-wide engagement number is close to useless because healthcare variation is within the building, not between buildings. Scores break out by unit, shift, and role so a single struggling med-surg night rotation stops being cancelled out by a healthy outpatient clinic.
Healthcare engagement scores run below cross-industry averages, so an absolute number without a sector comparison misleads leadership in both directions. Every dimension lands against an industry median, which is what turns a score into a decision.
From $49 a month for the entire organization with no per-employee meter. Per-employee pricing is precisely what makes health systems survey annually instead of quarterly, and engagement work is only visible as movement between two readings taken the same way.
Decide the segments before you send anything
Agree up front how results will break out: by unit, by shift, by clinical versus non-clinical, by tenure band. Segments defined after the fact tend to be the ones that make the result look acceptable, and first-year staff are the group most worth isolating.
Run short and anonymous, on their schedule
Structured question sets go to clinical and non-clinical staff and can be answered in a few minutes between other things. Responses are anonymous with a minimum segment size, which matters in an environment where being identified as the person who complained has professional consequences.
Read the drivers, not just the score
Culture and engagement returns 0 to 100 against the healthcare median, broken into the drivers underneath it, with the weakest named first and the segments where it is worst shown beside it.
Publish what you are changing, then re-score
The fastest way to kill the next survey is to collect this one and say nothing. Name two changes, say which finding drove them, then re-run in a quarter and check whether the driver moved rather than assuming it did.
DIAGNOSTIC INPUT, NOT A CERTIFIED AUDIT.
Assessmentcloud scores tell you how ready you are and what to fix. They do not certify you against SOC 2, ISO 27001, or any legal framework, and we never claim they do. Only an accredited auditor can certify you. Run the diagnostic first, walk into the audit without surprises, and spend auditor hours on certification instead of discovery.
A healthcare employee engagement survey measures how committed and supported clinical and non-clinical staff feel, and how likely they are to stay. It differs from a general engagement survey in the drivers it prioritizes, notably workload sustainability, scheduling predictability, manager capability among promoted clinicians, and whether raising a safety or staffing concern changes anything. It is a staff instrument and has no connection to patient experience measurement.
Cover six areas and keep the whole thing short. Workload and whether it ever returns to baseline. Scheduling and how much notice staff get. Manager support, asked about the immediate supervisor rather than the executive team. Whether concerns raised go anywhere. Whether staffing decisions get explained. And intent to stay, which is the single most predictive item in the set. Ten well-chosen items answered by most of the workforce beat sixty answered by the day shift.
Layer the cadence rather than picking one. An annual baseline gives you depth and a trend line. Short pulses every quarter catch the things that move fast in healthcare, which is most things: a unit reorganization, a staffing ratio change, a new documentation system. Lifecycle check-ins at thirty and ninety days matter more here than in most sectors, because first-year departures are where healthcare turnover concentrates.
Treat the response rate as a finding, not just a data-quality number. Long desktop-delivered annual surveys commonly return low participation from frontline clinical staff, while short mobile-friendly formats do substantially better because they fit into a shift. The more important test is whether participation is even: an overall rate that looks respectable but collapses to almost nothing on nights means your data describes the day shift, and the group you most needed to hear from opted out.
No. Press Ganey is the incumbent in healthcare employee experience and has by far the largest healthcare-specific comparison data behind its results, which is a genuine advantage we do not claim to match. Assessmentcloud is a broader organizational diagnostic that scores staff engagement as one of five benchmarked dimensions alongside process, technology, skills, and compliance readiness, at a flat published price. Health systems that need a nationally recognized engagement benchmark should use Press Ganey.
No, and this is worth checking before you buy anything. ANCC Magnet applications require nurse satisfaction data collected through an approved instrument and source, which is why NDNQI is so commonly used for it. Assessmentcloud is not an ANCC-approved instrument and results from it should not be submitted as Magnet evidence. If Magnet is the reason you are surveying, start from the approved vendor list and treat any other tool as supplementary.
The 2026 NSI National Health Care Retention and RN Staffing Report, published in March 2026 from 527 participating acute care hospitals, puts staff RN turnover at 17.6 percent, up 1.2 points, against an overall hospital turnover rate of 18.5 percent. The national RN vacancy rate is 8.6 percent, and a third of hospitals report 10 percent or higher. Figures are national averages and vary widely by region, specialty, and bed size, so benchmark against your own segment rather than the headline.
Because the cost of getting it wrong is unusually concrete. NSI puts the average cost of turnover for a bedside RN at $60,090, with the average hospital losing between $4.2m and $6.2m a year, and each single percentage point of RN turnover worth about $295,000 annually to an average hospital. Engagement is one of the few levers on that number that does not require new headcount. Notably, NSI found fewer than half of responding hospitals track the cost of turnover at all.
ILLUSTRATIVE FIGURES. NOT CUSTOMER DATA.
FLAT MONTHLY PRICE. NO PER-EMPLOYEE FEES.