Speak-up culture, scored not sensed
Replace "people seem guarded in meetings" with a number: how far your candor and speak-up conditions sit above or below the industry median, measured the same way every quarter.
CU-01
Psychological safety assessment: measure psychological safety across your organization with a benchmarked survey
People stay quiet for reasons you can measure. This assessment scores the conditions that decide whether employees raise problems early or sit on them until they become expensive: whether mistakes are punished, whether it is safe to disagree with a manager, whether asking for help costs you standing. Answer structured questions and get a 0 to 100 read on your speak-up culture, benchmarked against your industry, with the weakest driver named first.
FLAT MONTHLY PRICE FROM $49 · WHOLE COMPANY · NO PER-EMPLOYEE FEES
SAMPLE READOUT · DEMO DATA
RUNS IN YOUR BROWSER
/100
DIAGNOSTIC READINESS SCORE, NOT A CERTIFIED AUDIT
67
/100
PRIORITIZED ACTION PLAN
ILLUSTRATIVE SCORES. DIAGNOSTIC INPUT, NOT A CERTIFIED AUDIT.
DIRECT ANSWER
LAST UPDATED JULY 2026
A psychological safety assessment measures whether people believe they can speak up, admit mistakes, disagree, and ask for help without being punished for it. The construct comes from Amy Edmondson's research at Harvard Business School, first published in Administrative Science Quarterly in 1999, and Google's Project Aristotle later found it was the strongest single predictor of team performance in its own data. Most instruments on the market measure it inside one intact team: Edmondson's own licensed Fearless Organization Scan, LeaderFactor's four-stage model, and various team self-assessments all work that way, and for a single team that is the right tool. Assessmentcloud measures the organizational layer instead. It scores the company-wide culture dimension (CU-01), including candor, speak-up behavior, trust in leadership, and tolerance for surfacing bad news, on a 0 to 100 scale against the industry median, then places it beside process maturity, skills, and compliance readiness so you can see whether silence is a culture problem or the rational response to a process that punishes anyone who flags a defect. One honest boundary: this is not Edmondson's licensed scale, it does not produce a clinical or psychosocial risk finding, and it does not profile individual employees or diagnose one team's internal chemistry. It tells leadership whether the organization as a whole is safe enough to hear the truth. Pricing is flat, from $49 a month for the entire company.
Go deeper: this dimension works alongside team effectiveness assessment and company culture survey, and the guides on psychological safety survey questions and team effectiveness model show the frameworks behind the scoring.
CU-01
What you get
Anonymous by default
Responses are collected anonymously, which matters more here than on any other topic. A psychological safety survey that people fear signing tells you nothing except that they were right to be afraid.
Seen next to process and skills
Silence is often structural. Scoring safety beside process maturity and skills shows whether people are afraid to speak or simply have no working channel to speak through, which are different fixes.
Flat price, whole company
Measure psychological safety across every department from $49 a month flat, with no per-seat meter running and no consultant engagement required to read the report.
HOW IT WORKS
From setup to scored report
01
Choose the scope
Run the culture dimension on its own or alongside process, digital, skills, and compliance for the full organizational picture in one pass.
02
Collect anonymous responses
Structured question sets go out to employees anonymously. Most companies finish inside a week without standing up a project team.
03
Read the scored report
Culture returns a 0 to 100 score against the industry median, broken into the drivers behind it, so a low score points at a cause instead of a mood.
04
Fix the ranked gap first
The report names the two or three changes most likely to lift candor, then you re-run it next quarter and watch the number move or fail to.
DIAGNOSTIC INPUT, NOT A CERTIFIED AUDIT.
Assessmentcloud scores tell you how ready you are and what to fix. They do not certify you against SOC 2, ISO 27001, or any legal framework, and we never claim they do. Only an accredited auditor can certify you. Run the diagnostic first, walk into the audit without surprises, and spend auditor hours on certification instead of discovery.
FAQ
Questions about psychological safety assessment
Psychological safety is a shared belief that the team or organization is safe for interpersonal risk taking: that you can admit a mistake, ask a naive question, disagree with your boss, or flag a problem without being humiliated or penalized. Amy Edmondson defined it in her 1999 research. It is not about comfort or being nice, and it does not mean lower standards. High-performing groups combine high safety with high accountability.
You measure psychological safety with an anonymous survey that asks people to rate statements about speaking up, admitting error, asking for help, and raising bad news, then you score the responses and compare them to a benchmark. Edmondson's original scale uses seven items with three reverse-scored. The critical design points are anonymity, consistent wording over time, and a benchmark, because a raw average means nothing without something to compare it to.
The strongest questions describe a specific behavior rather than a feeling. Ask whether people can raise problems and tough issues, whether mistakes are held against them, whether it is safe to take a risk, whether it is difficult to ask others for help, and whether unique skills are valued. Reverse-score the negatively worded items so agreement does not always mean good news. We list fifty examples in our survey questions guide.
No. The Fearless Organization Scan is Amy Edmondson's own licensed instrument and it measures psychological safety inside a defined team across four domains. Assessmentcloud is not affiliated with it and does not use her scale. We score the organization-wide culture dimension, including candor and speak-up conditions, against an industry benchmark, and place it next to process, digital, skills, and compliance so leadership sees the whole system. Use the Scan for one team, use this for the company.
Judge it against a benchmark rather than an absolute. Assessmentcloud reports culture on a 0 to 100 scale against the median for your industry, and the useful reading is the gap: sitting eight points under your sector median is a real finding, while an isolated score of 64 tells you almost nothing. Track the direction too. A score that falls after a layoff or a reorg is telling you something specific about what people learned.
Because most operational failures are known to someone before they surface. When people expect blame, they withhold early warnings, so defects, compliance gaps, and failing projects reach leadership late and expensive. Google's Project Aristotle found psychological safety was the strongest predictor of team effectiveness in its data, ahead of who was on the team. Measuring it turns an abstract cultural virtue into an operating risk you can track.
Put psychological safety assessment on your company readout
ILLUSTRATIVE FIGURES. NOT CUSTOMER DATA.
FLAT MONTHLY PRICE. NO PER-EMPLOYEE FEES.